Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 04:37

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Nick And Vanessa Lachey Selling Encino Home For Millions - TMZ
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
What are the steps to prepare Your Hair for hair extensions?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Could You Live Without a Computer? I Can. - The Free Press
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The Apple AirPods Pro and AirPods 4 Drop to the Lowest Prices of the Year for Father's Day - IGN
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
How a grad student got LHC data to play nice with quantum interference - Ars Technica
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
If you were president, how would you make America "great again?"